HIST410N CCON Generation Kill A Conversation With Stanley McChrystal Analysis
Introduction
According to Biography.com, “Stanley A. McChrystal led the Joint Special Operations Command in Iraq during the Persian Gulf Wars and was top Commander of American forces in Afghanistan” (“Stanley McChrystal Biography,” n.d.). In the following interview, he describes the challenges of fighting terrorist/insurgent forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Instructions
Address the following in a case study analysis:
- According to McChrystal, how did the battle against terrorist organizations/insurgencies change after 9/11 and from what factors do they draw their strength?
- What technological methods are used in Afghanistan and Iraq and how have they been used tactically (i.e., what goals are they used to achieve)?
- Have they been successful?
- What is the risk of using technological capabilities against terrorists?
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double spaced
- 12-point Times New Roman font
- Title page
- References page
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Reference
Stanley McChrystal Biography. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.biography.com/people/stanley-mcchrystal-578710 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
HIST410N CCON Generation Kill A Conversation With Stanley McChrystal Analysis
Rubric
Case Study Grading Rubric – 100 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric – 100 pts
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength |
| 5.0 ptsMeets length requirement |
0.0 ptsDoes not meet length requirement |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
| 10.0 ptsPaper addresses all aspects of the assignment. |
8.5 ptsPaper addresses most aspects of the assignment. |
7.5 ptsPaper addresses some aspects of the assignment. |
6.0 ptsPaper addresses few aspects of the assignment. |
0.0 ptsNo effort |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis |
| 25.0 ptsThroughout the whole work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective. |
22.0 ptsThroughout most of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective. |
19.0 ptsThroughout some of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective. |
15.0 ptsThroughout little of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective. |
0.0 ptsNo effort |
|
25.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport |
| 20.0 ptsThroughout the whole work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support. |
17.0 ptsThroughout most of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support. |
15.0 ptsThroughout some of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support. |
12.0 ptsThroughout little of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support. |
0.0 ptsNo effort |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Style |
| 20.0 ptsThroughout the whole work, the text is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety. |
17.0 ptsThroughout most of the work, the text is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety. |
15.0 ptsThroughout some of the work, the text is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety. |
12.0 ptsThroughout little of the work, the text is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety. |
0.0 ptsNo effort |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting |
| 10.0 ptsThroughout the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style. |
8.5 ptsThroughout most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style. |
7.5 ptsThroughout some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style. |
6.0 ptsThroughout little of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources using APA style. |
0.0 ptsNo effort |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Title Page & References Page |
| 5.0 ptsPaper includes both title page and references page. |
2.5 ptsPaper includes either a title page or references page. |
0.0 ptsPaper does not include a title page or references page. |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Source Reference |
| 5.0 ptsPaper includes reference to the primary source provided within the case study. |
0.0 ptsPaper does not make reference to the primary source provided within the case study. |
|
5.0 p |
